Here are two useful sources for comparing the current and projected prices of different sources of renewable energy.
The first comes from Centre for Climate Change and Economics Policy report: the Case For and Against Onshore Wind Energy in the UK, starting on page 16.
The second comes from the Renewable Roadmap, from which I’ve constructed this table:
|Estimated levelised cost ranges for electricity technologies|
|£/MWh||2010 low||2010 high||2010 median||2020 low||2020 high||2020 median|
|AD < 5MW||£75||£194||£135||£70||£173||£122|
|Estimated levelised cost ranges for heat technologies|
|£/MWh||2010 low||2010 high||2010 median||2020 low||2020 high||2020 median|
|Off gas and elec. grid||£28||£53||£41||£31||£57||£44|
|Air source heat pump||£44||£55||£50||£42||£53||£48|
|Ground source heat pump||£62||£75||£69||£56||£67||£62|
|Biomass district heating||£61||£156||£109||£65||£159||£112|
|Source: Renewable Energy Roadmap p 16-17|
Here are a few useful links to government policy documents that (theoretically) underpin its current energy policy:
The Green Deal and the Energy Company Obligation consultation document covers a lot of detail about how the Green Deal will operate, and the new obligation the government will place on energy companies to improve energy efficiency and tackle fuel poverty.
The Draft Impact Assessment for the Green Deal also has lots of further useful technical stats and details on how the Green Deal will be implemented.
A link to all documents to do with the Green Deal consultation is here.
*Updated* Nov 2012
Here are all the details about the Energy Bill, now published on Nov 28th 2012. This page also has details on…
- Annual Energy Statement – This sets out an overview on the progress the Government has made in implementing policy on energy and climate change over the past 12 months.
- EMR Policy Overview
- Annex A: CfD Operational Framework (including the Call for Evidence on supplier obligation)
- Annex B: CfD heads of terms
- Annex C: Capacity Market Design and Implementation
- Annex D: Institutions: Delivering EMR
- Annex E: EMR delivery plan
- Annex F: EMR Roadmap Narrative
- EMR Roadmap
- Energy Bill Summary Impact Assessment
- Government Response to the Energy and Climate Change Committee
- National Grid Conflicts of Interest consultation
- Energy Security Strategy
- Statutory Security of supply Report
- Ofgem Gas Security of Supply
- Government response to consultation on consumer redress
- Electricity Demand Reduction Consultation
*Old Energy Bill stuff*
This section on the DECC website gives details about Electricity Market Reform and the draft 2012-13 Energy Bill, including policy briefs, impact assessments, and existing legislation in the area.
The Hills Fuel Poverty Review is an in-depth view of how fuel poverty is measured, an argument for why that measure should be changed, plus (at the end) some interesting analysis of how different government approaches would have different affects on the proposed new fuel poverty measure. I’m a little skeptical of the new measure, if only because on page 140 it states that the new ‘Low Income High Cost’ measure of fuel poverty proposed in the report would wipe off about 5 million people who would, by 2016, otherwise be classed as fuel poor. Still, it’s a very useful report that will be very relevant to the fuel poverty debate over the next few years.
Policy Impacts on Prices and Bills lists updated reports from DECC on the overall impact of policies like CERT, CESP and ECO on consumer energy bills
Here’s a nifty collection of facts about offshore wind in the UK from Renewable UK. Number 3 is particularly striking, I think:
The UK is the world leader in offshore wind with as much capacity already installed as the rest of the world put together. Given the current construction and development pipeline, the UK’s sector lead is likely to continue until 2020. The nation with the most offshore wind farms after the UK is Denmark.
Read more here: 10 Facts About Offshore Wind
The holy bible for statistics relating to energy policy is DUKES (the Digest of UK Energy Statistics). It has really in depth stats on UK energy production and use, broken down by energy type. It mostly covers the last 5 years, with some key indicators going back to 1970.
There is loads of interesting stuff here, but as with most government documents, the coolest stuff is near the end (in this case in a separate internet booklet).
Here, for example, are some fascinating flow charts on where different types of energy goes in the UK (these are in Annex H starting p 135):
And here’s some graphs on energy consumption by user and by fuel (p165-166)
This spreadsheet from DECC gives the estimated number of households living in fuel poverty by local authority, Parliamentary constituency and region.
The weakness in the figures is that they’re from 2009, which clearly predates a lot of recent energy price rises.
If I get time I might check on what’s happened overall to fuel poverty numbers since 2009, which would provide a crude mechanism for extrapolating an increase onto the local figures.
The spreadsheet shows in 2009 there were:
- 12,448 fuel poor households in Southampton (12.7% of households)
- The average (both median and mean) rate of fuel poverty by local authority was 18.2%- in Plymouth.
Fuel poverty rates by region are reproduced below:
|Fuel Poverty in English Regions|
|English region||Number of households1||Number of households in fuel poverty1||% of households fuel poor|
|East of England||2,388,522||387,672||16.2%|
|Yorkshire and the Humber||2,231,195||444,182||19.9%|
|1 Note: Household and fuel poverty numbers at region level come from the national fuel poverty statistics, 2009|
See the full spreadsheet: Fuel Poverty Sub Regional Statistics
The previously posted Committee on Climate Change Report on Household Energy Bills has a useful box with a quick explanation of different commonly used energy policy terms. I’ve found energy policy to contain some of the most unjustifiably inscrutable jargon, so I thought it was worth reproducing this box in full. This is on page 5 of the report.
Health warning: the descriptions for ECO, the Carbon Floor Price and for Electricity Market Reform are probably a little optimistic.
The independent Committee on Climate Change has a report showing what % of household energy bills can be attributed to “green” measures.
Looking at the impact of green measures between 2004-2010 (p12), the report says:
(c) Current total energy bills
Combining our analysis of electricity and gas bills for the typical dual-fuel household indicates that the average combined bill increased from £605 per household in 2004 to £1,060 in 2010. Of this £455 increase (75%, compared to general inflation of 16% over the same period):
- Around £380 was unrelated to low-carbon measures, with £290 due to increases in wholesale costs reflecting increases in the price of gas and supplier costs and £70 due to increasing transmission and distribution costs, and £20 due to VAT.
- Around £75 was due to low-carbon policy costs, within which it is important to distinguish between costs of £30 towards decarbonising the energy mix through support for investments in low-carbon power generation including renewables, and costs of £45 for funding of energy efficiency measures, without which bills could have increased further over this period.
Our analysis therefore clearly shows that it is not the case that energy bills are currently high due to costs of low-carbon measures. From 2004 to 2010 bills increased by £455 to £1,060, primarily in response to increased wholesale gas costs, with only £30 (7% of the increase and 3% of the bill) due to the costs of decarbonising the generation mix, and £45 (10% of the increase and 5% of the bill) due to funding improvements to the energy efficiency of homes.
Here’s the full report:
And here’s some illustrative graphs:
The gold standard for evidence-based arguments for tackling climate change remains the Stern Review, published by the UK Government in 2006. It’s an independent report that looks at the costs associated with tackling climate change, and the costs of not tackling climate change.
Chapter 1 is devoted to the science of climate change, and is a useful resource for rebutting popular climate change denier myths.
I particularly like this bit (p6):
Box 1.1 The “Hockey Stick” Debate.
Much discussion has focused on whether the current trend in rising global temperatures is unprecedented or within the range expected from natural variations. This is commonly referred to as the “Hockey Stick” debate as it discusses the validity of figures that show sustained temperatures for around 1000 years and then a sharp increase since around 1800 (for example, Mann et al. 1999, shown as a purple line in the figure below).
Some have interpreted the “Hockey Stick” as definitive proof of the human influence on climate. However, others have suggested that the data and methodologies used to produce this type of figure are questionable (e.g. von Storch et al. 2004), because widespread, accurate temperature records are only available for the past 150 years. Much of the temperature record is recreated from a range of ‘proxy’ sources such as tree rings, historical records, ice cores, lake sediments and corals.
Climate change arguments do not rest on “proving” that the warming trend is unprecedented over the past Millennium. Whether or not this debate is now settled, this is only one in a number of lines of evidence for human induced climate change. The key conclusion, that the build-up of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere will lead to several degrees of warming, rests on the laws of physics and chemistry and a broad range of evidence beyond one particular graph.
This document from DECC gives the number of people in fuel poverty in the UK from 1996.
In particular, there is a good graph on page 9 showing what’s happened with fuel poverty numbers since 1996, which is reproduced below.
There’s also a table on page 10 that lists fuel poverty numbers for the UK in each of those years:
Here are the updated figures for 2012: Annual Fuel Poverty Statistics 2012