Monthly Archives: March 2012
So the Government wants to send everyone an individual breakdown of where their (direct) taxes go. And there is the perfectly legitimate concern that with every breakdown, the Tories will want to make sure there is a big and unexplained box called ‘welfare’ that gets taxpayers angry and encourages a further crackdown on people on benefits.
If only there was a nice spreadsheet showing what ‘welfare’ spending actually consisted of- comparing spending on (say) incapacity benefit with (say) the state pension.
The DWP’s Benefit expenditure tables – Medium term forecast provides a good start.
Below is a quick pie chart based on table 1b from that spreadsheet- Table 1b: Benefit expenditure by benefit, £ million, real terms (2011/12 prices). This table breaks down every type of welfare expenditure that accounts for over 1% of the welfare bill for 2011/12.
Here’s a direct link to the spreadsheet: Medium-term benefit expenditure tables and caseload table from 1948/49 to 2016/17
In the course of the budget debate, I’ve had the teeth-grinding experience of listening to a que of Tory MPs stand up and denounce the lack of regulation on financial services and increased spending under the last Labour Government. Of course, the Labour response to this has always been to point out that prior to the banking crisis the Tories weren’t arguing for more regulation or spending cuts- in fact they were arguing for less regulation in the mortgage sector and increasing public spending overall.
Having just heard one Tory in the chamber flatly deny this was the case, I thought it was worth digging out the report on which this claim is in-part based.
Freeing Britain to Compete: Equipping the UK for Globalisation was written by John Redwood and welcomed by the Shadow Cabinet in August 2007.
Here are some insightful excerpts:
Mortgage Regulation. We see no need to continue to regulate the provision of mortgage finance, as it is the lending institutions rather than the client taking the risk.
10.3. Sharing the Proceeds of Growth
David Cameron and George Osborne have also stated that they would share the proceeds of growth between tax reductions and increased public spending. This formula commits the Conservatives to increasing the total of public spending by more than the rate of inflation, but not by as much as the overall increase in the UK’s economic output across the economic cycle. This not only explicitly rules out spending cuts, but will mean a substantial increase in the amount that can be concentrated on those public services which are most valuable and important to all of us; and it will also mean a redoubling of efforts to improve productivity and efficiency throughout the public service, so that each pound spent goes further.
The impact of such a refreshing approach should be significant, as an incoming Conservative government would be able to maintain and improve the quality and funding of public services, and to reduce tax rates. To make this possible, a Conservative government should reform the public sector, and emulate the success of the private sector by delivering more efficient service each year, although with the added benefit of more money, which the private sector (such as the UK’s manufacturing industry) often has to do without. We should ask the public sector to deliver more with more. The manufacturing sector has to deliver more with less each year.
“The Policy Group Report we launch today is the most impressive and comprehensive analysis of the state of the British economy produced by any political party in recent times.
“And the Report offers us a set of imaginative policy proposals directed at improving the competitiveness of our economy, rescuing our pension system and ensuring that more Britons and more parts of Britain share in the global prosperity of our times.”
Here’s my question. Why on earth have the Tories still got all this on their website?
This spreadsheet from HMRC shows the number of taxpayers who pay the basic rate, ‘higher rate’ (40p) and the ‘additional rate’ (50p) broken down by region.
The relevant spreadsheets start on page 16.
Based on those stats, I’ve put together the table below showing the proportion of people in each region paying each rate of tax for 2011-12. All these numbers are in thousands.
|Region||All||20p (basic rate)||40p (higher rate)||50p (additional rate)||20p%||40p%||50p%|
|Yorkshire & Humberside||2370||2050||230||13||86.50%||11.22%||0.55%|